patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City Approves New Logo but Rejects Slogan

Officials embraced a more colorful version of the Dunedin "E" brand design for attracting outsiders, but they want the branding committee to continue working on the slogan.

 

Leaders settled on what will be the city's unified brand image Thursday night.

However, they sent the proposed slogan, "Life Flows Your Way," back to the drawing board.

"I’m looking for something a little more kitschy, a little more exciting, a little more cool," Commissioner Julie Ward Bujalski told a Wilesmith Advertising representative.

If you could propose a new slogan to market Dunedin to outsiders, what would it be? Share your suggestions in the comments section below.

The new brand image depicts the multicolor word “DUNEDIN” in a clean, all-capital-letter, san-serif font, with a wavy, tri-color E. Each letter is a different color — orange, green, red, blue and yellow — which "makes a statement that you have a lot going on here," according to Wilesmith representative Scott Eurich. 

Underneath the DUNEDIN image was a byline and tagline that read: “Home of Honeymoon Island / Life Flows Your Way,” but commissioners sent it back for more work.

"I thought 'Home of Honeymoon Island' was good," Commissioner David Carson said, explaining that he believes it helps unify both sides of the community. "For a long time, I thought we had that (Honeymoon Island) separated out there." 

The byline, "Home of Honeymoon Island," was embraced by a majority the commission, but the tagline received a dissatisfied response.

"There are perception issues about what 'flows' is all about," Mayor Dave Eggers said.

Original Osprey Design Didn't Impress Citizens

The brand image and tagline was selected and recommended by the Branding Selection Committee in January after the group's original choice, a heart-shaped blue and green osprey, received unexpected public backlash. Commission input was stalled when it was discovered that the St. Pete Pier used a similar "E" design for its logo. However, the city attorney found no trademark or copyright infringements. The St. Pete Pier is slated for demolition in May 2013.

"It’s a very difficult thing to brand a city because a lot of people take it personally when you put a brand on them," Eurich said. He pointed out that allowing public input is usually where the process breaks down, adding that he wouldn't have suggested doing that.

Both Carson and Bujalski were quick to jump to the citizenry's defense. 

"Thirty-five thousand people do have a right to give their opinion because they’re paying for it," Bujalski said, explaining that six years of commission experience gives her some degree of expertise over the community response. "My expertise says we hit a nerve with some people. ... You've only been in Dunedin five or six times."

Although Carson said he would prefer using the original hotly-contested osprey design, which was enthusiastically endorsed by both Wilesmith Advertising and local ad designer Bill Francisco, whose agency has done national work for the likes of Busch Gardens and other companies, he agreed with Bujalski. "They’re paying for it," he said.

New Brand Will Be Used on Promotional Materials

Officials gave permission for the brand to be immediately incorporated on the city's website and other materials, while they await a marketing portfolio, plan and updated tagline.

Wilesmith Advertising of West Palm Beach was awarded a $73,000 contract in April 2011 to help establish a unified branding and marketing strategy for attracting outsiders to Dunedin.

Related Topics: Branding, Branding Selection Committee, City of Dunedin, Community Participation, and Tourism

Lori

9:18 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012

I'd have our local artists or high school artists; our community design one! This mimicks the pier...forget what the atty says about copyright infringment not taking place! Dunedin should be ashamed paying over 70k for a logo ANYONE could design on their home computer! THIS IS AWFUL...UGLY...MEANINGLESS! The infamous oranges would have been better. SHAME ON YOU DUNEDIN!...OFFICIALS! That $70k would have been better spent for our neighborhhoods, keeping gangs out and drugs, more police presence and helping areas in our neighborhoods that need lighting, sidewalks....

Reply

Mary Sault

9:23 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012

For a tag line, how about DUNEDIN You'll love our color (or) flavor (or) You'll love the difference. OR Dunedin: Your senses will explode!

Reply
Comment_arrow

C.w. Petit

8:47 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012

How about.."You'll love our colours..and incorporate some Scottish colors in the logo ?

Comment_arrow

Rene' Johnson

1:12 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012

The first time I came to Dunedin I remember it being tagged as "Delightful Dunedin" and I soon fell in love with the community. I still refer to Dunedin as "Delightful" because it was catchy and really did sum up what I feel about the city. I like the alliteration and even though it is not very different than the old catch phrase - I vote for Decidely Delightful. No matter what tag phrase or logo is selected, it doesn't change the community or all the reasons we love it. Dunedin is still the envy of neighboring communities and the amount of involvement and feedback from the residents speaks volumes as to the reason why.

Cecilia

6:36 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

How about the tagline DUNEDIN - St. Pete Pier is closing soon so we lifted their logo? (and all at the bargain price of 73k.)
NO I could not have done it better myself as I am not a graphic artist, however I think a paid profession could have at least come up with something original-that is what branding is. It is disheartening that so much was spent and it appears to have been copied from a neighboring town - they couldn't have even copied one from another state so that at least there was some distance??
I am a team player if this is what it is - it is what it is. If this is what we get as a town, then we gotta embrace it, pull together and support it. For me, it will just take a minute to do that.

Reply

Merrill

8:23 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

Did the city really pay someone for that INSIPID logo? With a town full of artistic talent, it's an embarrassment.... At least they voted down the wimpy slogan.
That logo looks like it should be on a water company billing statement.
Take a walk down Main Street and one can come up with a dozen creative logo ideas better than that loser....
Any local artist will be willing to do a better one...and at much less cost, I'll bet!
Just sayin'.............

Reply

Carrie Joyce

8:42 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

DunEdin...Eco-friendly and Everything you Ever nEEded it to bE ....

Reply

Christine

9:15 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

Do Need You in Dunedin - Come join us!

Reply

Heidi Thompson

9:20 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

The new "logo" really is quite bad. Further, I understand that this is to be used on promotional materials - NOT as signs coming into town. If I understand that correctly, the original logo would have done nicely. The town could mail that out wherever they liked. For those living here, I think our Scotsman welcome is just what we like.

Reply

Jean Shelby

9:50 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

Can't believe the original Osprey Design was shot down. Your new logo is pretty lame to say the least. Come on Dunedin, you can do better then this!

Reply
Comment_arrow

C.w. Petit

8:54 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012

I like the osprey design and solgan but with the added reference to Dunedin's Scottish Hertiage..in plaid or something..like a plaid sripe down one of the "waves".

Dave Pauley

10:17 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

By definition branding is "Identity to tell one from another in symbol and written form" and a logo is "a means to promote instant recognition". I appears a branding has been turned down in favor of a logo which can change colors to support other activities in town.
I am disappointed that we let what was professionally done with committee approval go to waste. What was originally presented was BRANDING.

Dave

Reply

Sheri

10:25 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

maybe we need to take a look at the people who are supposed to be representing us and spending our money. they drug their feet and delayed the historic hotel to the point that it is now just sitting there...abandoned. they have hem-hawed to the point that a lot of interested industries/companies have moved on. and now they spent 73,000 for a logo that is so insufficient.

about the logo....what's with the colors. the blue is turquois, the green is florescent, the orange is bland. it is not appealing to even look at. and the catch phrase: home of honeymoon island? really? what about the fenway hotel and all the firsts dunedin has. what about our scottish heritage? what about our fabulous downtown area?

and....for the 73,000 that was spent, why weren't the residents asked?

shame, shame.

Reply

Sheri

10:33 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

ps.....why are we promoting Honeymoon Island? It is a state facility. Dunedin residents have to pay the same as everyone else to use the facility. Don't get me wrong...i love honeymoon island and have purchases the annual pass every single year. i love it there...but i think we have other options.

Reply

Ed Burghard

1:14 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012

The tagline should be a pithy articulation of the core promise Dunedin is making. A brand is a promise. It sets an expectation of an experience. Without knowing the promise, it is impossible to judge the tagline.

Reply

LucidGal

8:27 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012

In 30 years in the ad business, I've seen far worse, but $73K? I'd have done it for $50K, tops. On a galloping horse, it looks like it says "DUN DIN." Dunedin: Delightful" is short and sweet. Or, "Go with the flow" ... www.getlucid.net

Reply

PK

10:40 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012

The osprey-heart at least looked artistic, and you could read the name of the town. This thing with the wavy E reads "DUN~DIN". A person used to seeing the name "Dunedin" will perhaps tend to see the waves as an E, but I doubt that would be true for people unfamiliar with it, not at first glance. What catches the eye is two separated three letter groups, DUN & DIN.

And it is just a generic sort of piece, nothing characteristic of the town in it. Nothing Scottish, no dogs, no sunset over the water... I agree with what others have said: with all the talent in this town, a local competition would produce dozens of ideas that top this one.

Reply

Dan Wiberg

8:58 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012

How about "Dunedin. We paid $70,000 for this."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Hackworth

11:51 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012

I really like it, Dan's tag line, not the logo.

Comment_arrow

Cecilia

6:49 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

PLEASE get your facts straight - that would be "Dunedin We Paid 73,000.00 for this" with a very very small italics p.s. that says, "please refer to the St. Pete Pier Logo" LOLOLOLOL HAHAHAHAH!
Dan, love your tag line.

Comment_arrow

Arlene V

10:55 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

Thanks Dan - and that did not cost me anything!!! Yes, I really love "Dunedin - We paid $73,000.00 for this." LOL

Lori

8:40 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

Well, when it first cam to my attention that this logo was approved a few months back...I voiced my opinion and not on Patch...Directly to the "Powers That Be" in Dunedin...and as usual trhey have a comment for everything..They said that they had asked residents what they thought and they thought it was great! BULL...If this Patch and its comments are any indication the general concensus appears that it is not liked! Maybe all those "residents" they interviewed were city officials????? Again... SHAME ON YOU WHOEVER APPROVED THIS $73K joke!

Reply

Col. Korn

8:55 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

My Dear Comrades,

"Dunedin: Haven For Knee-Jerk Reactionaries"

No, that wont do....But How about,
"Dunedin: Home of the Highlanders"..........

Or aren't you people proud of our Young Folks anymore?!

Your Obt. Svt.
Col. Korn,
Chief O" Mayhem in the Great WW-2,
Now Chief O" Security and Sanitation (And the Complaint Dept.)
OXOjamm Studios.

Reply

Michael Keesler

9:17 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

The logos were a waste of money. It should have been a lot cheaper to come up designs with the talent on our own city. That is not 70k worth of work. Disappointed in the decision making process.

Reply

Lori

9:39 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

What happened to our Scottish roots?????

Reply

Michael Keesler

10:06 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

Should of asked Island Outpost where who designed their brand since it is way better and maybe did not cost $73,000.

Reply

Arlene V

10:50 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

One thing the powers that be can do REALLY well is - spend our money!! Our "brand" (or lack thereof) is a perfect example of that!! Dunedin - Simply Delightful :)

Reply

Lori

10:52 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

So....City of Dunedin...Where are ALL these "residents" who thought this was a GREAT logo and voted on it????? None here on Patch!!! Hmmmmm...MORE waste!

Reply

Lori

10:53 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

To Dan Wiberg----BEST COMMENT EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Cecilia

6:43 am on Tuesday, April 24, 2012

To take this all a step further...What are the Marketing plans that the City has? Or are there any? I continue to hear that this branding logo is designed to be used in Dunedin's marketing????? Are they planning to market to bring more tourists - like that idea; it bring in $$, bring in new industry/business, like that idea it bring in $$ - to attract new residents, if so what demographic are they hoping to attract, young professionals, familes, diverse, seniors?
MAYBE, MAYBE if we knew what the marketing was to be geared toward all of us might have a better idea of what this new logo is trying to convey. Is there a concrete marketing plan or is this colorful, happy 73K logo just something pretty to stick on letterhead? Does anyone know?

Reply

Lori

1:22 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012

You know that city officials who made this decision are reading this...Can't imagine why they won't comment....

Reply

Dave Carson

9:39 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012

I read every comment and find most of them valid. I did not vote for the branding process as I believed it should have been done by local people. We have many creative talented citizens quite capable of this job, and I think they would have done a great job.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecilia

6:48 am on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Commissioner Carson - having made some in tongue in cheek comments about this - I do have real questions with regard to my last post. What are the marketing plans that the City Commissioners have in mind for the use of this logo? Please refer to my previous comment for specifics. Very sincerely, that migt give us (even those who have made funny, less than polite/politicaly correct comments) a chance to view this logo/brand with different eyes.

Thank you.

Arlene V

8:37 am on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Thank you for responding Commissioner Carson and for your input. I appreciate that you wanted to keep this project local but you were outvoted. And, that you also take the time to read the comments posted and keep a finger on the pulse and Patch!

Reply

Kim madley

3:14 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Excellent forum...let's keep it going to fruition.

Kimberly Madley

Reply

Dave Carson

8:43 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

This branding initiative is to be used by the business community for their marketing plans. The City has budgeted no funds for marketing of this new brand. Stay tuned for any changes to this issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arlene V

11:25 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Dave - is this is true, why did the City fork out $73K to pay for the project? Why didn't the business community pay for the branding initiative if they are going to avail themselves use of this "brand"?

Comment_arrow

Cecilia

11:31 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

OK - so in order to help local existing businesses build/bring-in more business, which in turn does create revenue for Dunedin, this logo/brand was conceived, appropriated for out of the City Budget, paid for and approved by the City Commission? The city itself has no plans in place to use this to also generate income by attracting NEW businesses, more residents, bring in more events that in turn bring in more $$ to the town coffers, etc., to justfy this cost. It seems to me that the businesses should be doing their own branding, or am I really missing something? This is a bit difficult to understand for a lay person.

Thank you for clarifying this.

Cecilia

Dave Carson

8:47 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

By the way, the Patch is a great source of news in Dunedin. We are very lucky to have them in town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arlene V

11:39 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Ditto - the Dunedin Patch is fabulous!!

Lori

10:49 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

This branding initiative is to be used by the business community for their marketing plans. The City has budgeted no funds for marketing of this new brand. Stay tuned for any changes to this issue.
PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS COMMENT...GUESS I'M MISSING SOMETHING.
THANK YOU

Reply

Dave Carson

8:03 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Lori, what do you not understand?

Reply

Leave a comment